TORNADO - The Team with the Comedy Flying Cow
RECOMMENDED BATTERIES
(2002 - Series 6)

DO NOT BUY BATTERIES FOR ROBOT WARS UNTIL YOU HAVE READ THIS!

Team Tornado Battery Test 2002: Method
The test method was the same as the tests performed for Series 5/2001 - our UPS inductor in a bucket of water, hooked up to the logging system on a computer.
Batteries were considered dead when their off load voltage had dropped below 10V. In addition to this however, low current testing was performed on a few selected batteries, using car headlamp bulbs as convenient low current loads. The current characteristics of the bulbs were modelled in the Picolog software, to enable many batteries to be tested at low current at once.
Again we tested a selection of batteries - seven Hawker Genesis 16Ah, two Hawker Odyssey PC680 (16Ah), three Hawker Genesis 13Ah...
...three new style SBS15s, six old style SBS15s (the ones we have had since our original tests in 2000), three Kiel 18Ah...
...one Dryfit A500 16Ah, one Portalac 17Ah...
...and eight Diamec 12Ah.
Only one battery failed during the tests; that was one of the 12Ah Diamecs.

Team Tornado Battery Test 2002: Results
Instead of using graphs, the results are presented numerically, which should make comparison of the batteries a lot easier. The figures shown below are averages of all the batteries tested where there are more than one of each type - all the batteries were considered "good".


High Current Test (approx. 100 amps)
Battery

Rated Capacity
Weight
Dimensions

Measured Capacity
Start Resistance
End Resistance
Time Into Load
Efficiency (Ah/kg)
Efficiency (%rated)
Hawker
Genesis
16Ah
6.4kg
180Lx75W
x167H
8.84Ah
0.010ohm
0.057ohm
5.57mins
1.38
55%
Hawker
Odyssey
16Ah
6.4kg
180Lx75W
x167H
9.52Ah
0.011ohm
0.087ohm
6.33mins
1.49
60%
Hawker
Genesis
13Ah
4.9kg
176Lx84W
x130H
7.25Ah
0.011ohm
0.073ohm
4.62mins
1.48
56%
Hawker SBS15
(new style)
14Ah
4.8kg
200Lx77W
x137H
5.97Ah
0.014ohm
0.049ohm
3.92mins
1.24
43%
Hawker SBS15
(old style)
14Ah
4.8kg
200Lx77W
x137H
6.56Ah
0.015ohm
0.051ohm
4.35mins
1.37
47%
Kiel

18Ah
6.1kg
175Lx75W
x175H
7.18Ah
0.018ohm
0.081ohm
5.45mins
1.18
40%
Dryfit
A500
16Ah
6.0kg
180Lx76W
x167H
6.24Ah
0.021ohm
0.114ohm
4.65mins
1.04
39%
Portalac

17Ah
6.3kg
182Lx77W
x167H
7.89Ah
0.016ohm
0.113ohm
5.40mins
1.25
46%
Diamec

12Ah
3.9kg
152Lx100W
x105H
5.03Ah
0.021ohm
0.122ohm
3.89mins
1.29
42%

Low Current Test (approx. 5 amps)
Battery

Rated Capacity
Measured Capacity
Efficiency (%rated)
Hawker
Genesis
16Ah
11.40Ah
71%
Hawker
Odyssey
16Ah
12.08Ah
76%
Hawker SBS15
(old style)
14Ah
11.89Ah
85%
Portalac

17Ah
15.38Ah
90%
Diamec

12Ah
7.63Ah
64%


Team Tornado Battery Test 2002: Conclusions
Comparing the heavier (6kg+) batteries first, it can be seen that the cheaper Lead Calcium types (Kiel, Dryfit and Portalac) do not perform spectacularly - they have a high internal resistance and deliver a poor capacity of only around 1.2Ah/kg (the Dryfit is particularly bad given how expensive it is!). Compare these to the Genesis and Odyssey 16Ah Lead Tin batteries - in all cases these have a lower internal resistance, and deliver a better capacity of about 1.4-1.5Ah/kg. The Odyssey in particular is worth noting - it delivers a final capacity of nearly 10Ah, pretty spectacular for a 16Ah SLA!
Comparing the remaining (lighter) batteries, the old style SBS15s perform pretty well, although these are no longer available and the ones tested here are the six remaining "good" ones from our original nine. The newer SBS15s are dissapointing, with similar efficiency to the cheap and cheerful (and small) lead calcium Diamec - newer type SBS's are not recommended for use in robots therefore. However, the best of the bunch is the Genesis 13Ah - it has similar efficiency and internal resistance to the 16Ah Hawkers, but is a fair bit lighter.
The low current tests show the difference between low current "backup" type batteries and the high current delivery Hawkers - the measured capacity and efficiency of the Portalac (and to some extent the old SBS15s) increases dramatically at low current, while the 16Ah Hawkers do not improve proportionally that much (although in all cases the measured capacity is greater, as would be expected).
It is worth noting that since these tests were performed, Hawker have again rearranged their battery lineup. The SBS15 and Genesis batteries in future will be aimed at low current and backup situations, and although currently they are all the same batteries internally, the internal construction is going to change. Hawker (and Hawker dealers) will only provide warranties on Odyssey batteries for high discharge cyclic applications, so if you are buying new Hawkers, you need to be buying Odysseys! The Odyssey range consists of the following: PC535 (14Ah), PC545 (13Ah), PC680 (16Ah), PC625 (17Ah), PC925 (26Ah), PC1200 (42Ah), and PC1700 (70Ah). The PC925 is probably the largest battery anyone would want to use in a heavyweight robot!
Remember also that the results should be scalable for different batteries within the same ranges as those tested - i.e. a 26Ah Odyssey is still going to be much better than a 26Ah Dryfit!

Team Tornado Battery Test: Recommendations

If cost is important, and you're not likely to draw a lot of current (e.g. you have a 2WD robot with a non-electric weapon), then lead calcium type batteries such as the Kiels, Steatites or Portalac should do the job. You won't have quite the best performance, but you'll save a lot of money. Alternatively, any of the Hawkers in good secondhand condition will be a good buy.

If you want the ultimate, then go for the Odyssey batteries from Hawker. You might consider the PC545 (13Ah) instead of the PC680 (16Ah), both perform very well and are available surprisingly cheaply from Knight Batteries.

If weight is important, then you need the Hawker Odyssey PC545 (13Ah). It's not worth wasting your time with 12Ah lead calcium batteries or the Hawker SBSs, unless you only have a 2WD machine with wheelchair motors.

See our Suggested Suppliers list for details of where you can buy the Hawker, Kiel and Steatite batteries.

Team Tornado Battery Test: Postscript
We have performed initial tests on Nicad "Battlepacks" (many thanks to John Reid from Terrorhurtz for lending them to us). The results show that when sufficient packs are combined in parallel (4 parallel packs), then the performance is equivalent to the same voltage series combination of Hawker Odyssey SLAs, but with a significant weight saving.
However, paralleling batteries is a dangerous thing to do if you are not extremely careful, and there are many pitfalls. See our Background Information page for details of the problems you could have. The cost of Nicads and the chargers you must have to charge them properly is a lot more than SLAs, and Nicads have a finite maximum output current, so if you peak current demands are very high, you will need even more packs in parallel. For all these reasons, we will continue to use Hawker Odysseys.


| Home || Build Diary || Official Merchandise || Site Map || E-Mail |